RSS Feed

Designing For Delight, Not Just Data

I’ve recently been using a new lens to look at the world of both candidate experience and the employer brand. It’s a lens that came from reading about user experience design from a web perspective, which is far more focused on conversion than recruitment has typically been. And it’s given me some interesting insights into what our mission actually is.

We are in the business of creating experiences. Whether we intend to or not.

More often than not, the candidate experience is dictated by what our systems allow us to do. Or what our web design team allows us to do. Or what our schedules allow us to do. Candidate experience is a by-product of other decisions made for other reasons. It is not often the driver of those decisions – it is the composite result of choices made by procurement, marketing, HR, IT and other parts of the organisation. And in many cases, this patchwork of influences is abundantly clear.

We are trying to get people to bind our story to their own narrative. Our goal is to build enthusiasm in the minds of talented individuals, who experience what we have to offer and being to superimpose this expectation over their current reality. Every image and tag line, every press ad and online classified ad, every web banner and trade show – these are all supposed to create a brand personality that others enjoy, and buy into as something that strengthens their self image.

As much as I hate the over-reliance on dating analogies, in this case, the comparison suits very well. We want people to like us for who we are, and we should be presenting the best version of ourselves wherever possible. We should be making a proud statement, and finding ways to help people see us as a good choice for the future. And most of all, we should be going to extraordinary lengths to build the kind of experience that they’ll remember, and that sets the template for our behaviour.

Having applied for quite a few jobs recently, I’ve been reminded of just how much barren and bland it can be. It’s  clearly driven to satisfy a corporate  process, in a bleak digital environment, with minimal information available to the applicant. This is particularly the case when one considers how much information the applicant provides in the application process. The information imbalance creates discomfort and a sense of feeling exposed. It makes the candidate feel, well, like a commodity. Which is a bad way to enter into any relationship, even if that’s what the candidate expected from their own experience in applying for other roles.

We can design these processes and interactions better. We can design for delight and pleasure, rather than just satisfying process. Every company has feedback on its application process and where it alienates candidates instead of delighting them. Every company has the capacity to create better experiences through either automated or human interactions with candidates. And what’s more, given the money we spend on advertising, search, social recruiting, careers sites and SEO, shouldn’t we be  making sure that the end point of all that activity isn’t the weakest part of our sales chain?

 

Tech, Tools And Talent (or Things I Learned At SOSU Sydney)

Few things excite me more than getting to talk to people who are great at something I don’t know much about. So being invited to attend last week’s SOSU event in Sydney and speak on emotional branding was awesome for two reasons. Firstly, I got to stand up and talk about how emotional connections breed alliances, communities and strengthen people’s decisions (in a presentation full of memes). And second, I was able to hear some really amazing information from some world class speakers.

The easiest place to begin is with Irina Shamaeva who delivered quite a few of the sessions. Irina’s expertise fits her like an overcoat – she is clearly on the leading edge of this technology. Her first session on Boolean search showed tremendous insight and talent, not just in the tools and technology of sourcing, but also in understanding how they can be applied to the very human world of people’s careers. The thing that struck me most about this introductory session was that, right from the beginning, we recognised the limitations of all the tools in this toolkit. Sourcing can seem like witchcraft to the uninitiated, and this really helped bring home that it was a language to be spoken for best results, not some arcane incantation.

Irina’s other sessions, focusing on building road maps for success and on mastering social search, added depth and complexity to the day’s technical wizardry. Watching a master at work when showing advanced LinkedIn tricks or demonstrating how the ingredients of a sourcing function combine was captivating. It was a real pleasure to learn from her, and the crowd’s questions and comments reflected their enthusiasm also.

Rowena Caruana from Futurestep’s session was also an interesting one for me. Building talent communities is a challenge even for socially adept organisations, so seeing how this can be outsourced was very instructive. The OneSteel example was particularly interesting (and not just because I used to work there!) and showed just what’s involved in building a diverse and comprehensive digital strategy for talent communities. This was a good presentation to open the eyes of people looking at building basic talent communities, and if anything, wasn’t given enough time on the agenda to really flesh out the challenges. I know I had lots of questions at morning tea!

The panel session featuring Vanina from Deloitte, Rhys from Adobe and Rod from Dell was really enjoyable also. It’s nice to get a peek behind the curtain into large organisations and their logistic challenges around talent. And while each presenter had different strategies and stories to tell, the enthusiasm and passion of each was clearly evident. As a social media nerd, it’s always interesting to see the tone in the Twitter stream shift from good humour to an almost awed respect, and this definitely happened during the panel session. It was a well-delivered combination of passionate people and great stories, facilitated well by Riges Younan from Avature.

The four other individual sessions really captured individual corners of the sourcing world as well. Mark Reilly from HRX gave an incredibly detailed and relaxed presentation about metrics and data that built effortlessly on his analytical focus.Dan Nuroo showed us his historical background and personal cheat-sheet, telling us all about the Dark Arts of Sourcing from his career. Vanina from Deloitte took the stage again for a closer look at Deloitte’s People Analytics, and delivered a presentation that was equal parts personality, professionalism and practical tips. And Kelly O’Shaughnessy from Ashurst delivered a clever, funny and very energetic presentation on what it’s like to manage the social brand of a global law firm,, complete with cupcakes, Futurama jokes, Kardashians and a plethora of easy-to-use take aways.

The thing that struck me from every presentation was the clearly visible passion of these people. Everyone at the summit, from the speakers to the attendees to the staff running the event, clearly cared about sourcing as a talent stream. The discussions were frank and honest, and there were many visible ‘lightbulb’ moments as people applied the lessons from the stage to their own world.

A massive thank you to Phillip Tusing and the Destination Talent team, both for allowing me to present and to learn from a panel of such esteemed sources. It was an enjoyable and lucrative conference, and one that I’m sure has spawned lots of discussion and internal change already!

The First Step Is A Mirror

Social media has transformed the way we see ourselves. Humans are connected by technology to a degree that has never existed before. In Australia, more than half the population has a Facebook account, and the number of smart phones exceeds the number of toilets. Every minute, more than 2 million videos are watched on YouTube, more than 650,000 updates are made on Facebook, and more than 200 million emails are sent. We are a technologically conversant society. And in this festival interaction, we have begun to receive influence from, and lend influence to, relationships unlike anything ever before.

We use social media to airbrush our lives. We post updates that show the best of ourselves. We create a public narrative that can be very different to the actual happenings of our lives, in the interest of competing with the narratives our friends and contacts publish. We look, in an ever widening sphere, for approval and acceptance. The destruction of traditional communities has led us to create new ones, built around interest and hobby, spread across geography and demographic, and for us to build our own sense of self (and sometimes, self-worth) from the way we interact with these communities.

Part of this is the rise in continuous partial attention. We are now so connected that we absorb messages and communications from multiple points simultaneously, and often in a very superficial way. Focus is becoming more difficult to measure, as people are simultaneously engaged in building multiple connections or narratives within their lives. We have evolved into a society of connected people, each using technology to further our own happiness through social interaction, and always attentive for the next missive, the next text, the next email. We are continuously more defined by our intense understanding of, and ability to derive benefit from, the platforms that connect people through technology.

Nowhere is this more relevant, or less understood, than in the search for a career. We are all searching for meaning, and as we have shifted away from traditional views about work (ie a job for life) the meaning has become about doing what makes us feel happy. We are driven to find careers, and employers, and workplace cultures, that reinforce our self-identity and give us the largest possible benefit. We want to do great work, with interesting and fun people, that benefits us both at work and in our private lives. And how do we find these opportunities? We look in the place where our access to people and information exists. We go to the internet.

People are more than nine times more likely to accept a recommendation from a peer or a member of their chosen community than from an anonymous source or an advertisement. People are more likely to view a brand favourably that interacts with them than one which keeps them at arm’s length. People who are comfortable with technology are more likely to use that technology to start conversations with brands. And people who have no historical model to use on ‘how this should be done’ are more likely to do what feels natural. In short, graduates who are comfortable using social media and the internet are more likely to connect and absorb a brand’s message than anyone in history.

Companies have an undiscovered, and almost universally under-utilised, resource around finding and building an emotional connection with people. Brands can listen to the chatter online and address misinformation. Brands can join the conversation around their offering to people. Brands can build sites that let the public ask questions. Brands can share information faster, and more broadly, than ever before. Brands can create lasting, self-sustaining emotional connections with potential talent. And most importantly, brands can become part of the desired self-image of the talent they’d like to hire, and make the move from being ‘on the list’ to ‘being the list’ of companies to work for.

Sadly, many companies, particularly in Australia, don’t do this. Instead, they build token presences and websites, and do not address the point of social media – connection. It’s not enough to be on Facebook; companies must be as energetic, interesting and responsive as people are. It’s not enough to have a Twitter account – it must be interesting, opinionated, regularly updated and genuinely build conversation. It’s not enough to have videos on YouTube – they need to tell a story, not just record a graduate talking at the camera. Social media is about narrative. It’s about telling stories. And, done correctly, it’s about having people identify with those stories, and voluntarily either share them, share their own story, or want to join in.

Using social media as a brand is about attitude. And it’s about having the attitude that every story has an audience waiting somewhere, an audience that genuinely wants to know more. It’s about having the attitude that people share great stories, and that in order to connect with the hearts and minds of potential talent, the content must be about people, must be easily shared, must be great and must tell a story.

Rather than talking about the tools, this is the first list we use to determine whether a company is ready to use social media properly.

  1.  Are we comfortable being exposed to the opinions, thoughts and comments of real people, knowing they may be positive or negative?
  2. Are we committed make finding social content a priority for our brand? Are we prepared to invest time, effort and money into building our brand on social media?
  3. Will we make our values transparent online, and be prepared to live them when attacked, derided, criticised, harangued or protested against?
  4. Is our brand strong enough to accept public vitriol or public affection without the risk of being derailed or diverted from our purpose on social media?
  5. Do we have a plan in place to deal with negative and positive feedback that takes the emotional reaction of our Community Managers out of the equation?
  6. Will we listen, respond and give the same consideration to our brand on social media that we would give to press releases, corporate videos, shareholder announcements and any other public communications?
  7. Will we make it a priority to give all our staff the learning and development necessary to use these tools, and to be comfortable with our use of them as a brand?

Engineering The Daily Decrease

Simplicity is its own reward. Simplicity is the honesty of function, expressed as a reduced equation. This is how it works. This is what it is. Simplicity makes it easier to get it done.

Simplicity is, as Bruce Lee so beautifully put it, the daily decrease. It is hacking away at the unessential. It is reducing those things which do not give you results, or do not propel you towards your goals.

Simplicity is sprezzatura, the ballet of effort in which every step has purpose, and nothing exists that cannot be explained. It is the marriage of passion and purpose, the fusion of form and function, the intersection of clarity and courage.

We are told every day we need more. We need more channels, more platforms, more technology, more clothes, more friends. For every thing you adopt, you lose the focus you could have pointed at those things you focused on before. So if you’re going to move toward the new, you have to prune the old.

Prune your process. If it is inessential, don’t stand for it. If it adds nothing, subtract it. Make things as simple as you can, and they will conduct energy more effectively and efficiently than the complex structures you had before. Don’t hold on to legacy structures or ideas because they were once good. So was the 8 track. So was the video tape.

Remove. Reduce. Revise. Revisit.

 

Is Your Social Marketing Creating Pictures Or Telling Stories?

I had an interesting conversation with a client the other day, who is taking their first steps into the social recruitment space. As a client, they have plenty of good stories to tell, and no shortage of anecdotal content to access within the business. They are also aggressively expanding the workforce, which gives them plenty of scope for building content capture frameworks.

Our discussion was around building a content timeline and a rhythm for posting, rather than just dumping content onto the individual platforms as it came to hand. The client’s position was that getting as much content onto the platforms was important for their presence, and likened it to developing a Polaroid photo. “If we shake hard enough we get a picture faster. And isn’t that what we’re trying to do?’

This started me thinking. Is it really what we’re trying to do?

I don’t think it is. Pictures may be worth a thousand words, but pictures have no narrative. Pictures create a frame, a moment in time captured as visual stimuli. Pictures do not evolve, they do not grow in complexity and most of all, they do not become more effective if revealed slowly.

We are trying to tell stories. We are trying to build narratives. And narratives rely on rhythm and the progression of time.

Having a content strategy goes beyond just being able to discover content within the organisation.  Just dumping content into the platform as it becomes available doesn’t create lengthy engagement or a sense of reliable pace. And that pace is important for building trust and a story that goes beyond ‘Hey, look at my photos! Look at this video I made! Things!’

The point of using social platforms to build a compelling experience of the brand is to create a relationship that inspires and requires trust. It’s about inviting people to become part of your company’s timeline, and being transparent with your information so they can see exactly what they’re getting. It is not about just creating an impression – the design and user experience of the platforms do that. It’s about creating an emotionally-connective journey that is part parable, part entertainment and part illustration.

The other thing is that pictures become familiar, and lose their appeal, very quickly. The impact of a picture is absorbed and loses its power with familiarity. To continually reward engagement, we must build a story worth telling.

 

The Problem With Status Updates

I ran a little experiment recently at the ATC in Sydney. I wandered around with a video camera and microphone on the second day at lunch, and challenged a few people to do something on camera, for a stranger, that they normally do every day. I asked them for a status update. I asked people to, without using their name or job title, finish the sentence ‘I am….’

I haven’t yet decided whether to turn the resulting footage into a film or not (the audio is pretty crowded). However, I found it interesting for a couple of reasons. Firstly, people were really uncomfortable on the other side of a camera, which goes some way to showing why people aren’t great with video interviewing. And second, some people had real trouble finishing that sentence. Some people gave me great answers, like ‘I am going to be a grandfather any day now’ and ‘I am foxy.’ Some people thought maybe it was for official purposes, so said things like ‘I am learning a lot’ or ‘I am really excited to be representing X company at this wonderful event.’ And some people clearly flubbed it.

The thing that strikes me about this is that we do this every day. Facebook updates. Twitter status. LinkedIn status. YouTube comment. We regularly update a faceless world of ‘connections’ with personal thoughts. And yet, when a stranger with a camera asks the same question, we start to worry about how it will be used. In fact, this was what I was asked most – “What’s this for?”

I discussed this with one of the interviewees (who was clearly relieved that the video probably wouldn’t see the light of day) and her perspective was that, when confronted with the reality of a stranger being able to record what you’re saying and use it for their own purposes, a person becomes nervous because the possibilities are all too real. When updating a status online, the anonymous masses who can see and search your status aren’t in your face, and are therefore not top of mind.

No big lesson here. Just something to ponder next time you update your status somewhere. Would you say what you’re saying into the lens of a camera? Because that’s what you’re doing.

The ATC 2012 Series – People and Social

Woah. Blog four. We’ve passed the trilogy stage, people!

The final aspect of the ATC is always the focus on people. Whether this is through the topics of speakers, a focus on social media or the networking aspect, there’s always a strong element of interaction and personal development. After all, you can’t have a Talent Conference without the talent!

The first presentation that really struck the ‘people talking about people’ chord was the presentation from Jen Dalitz, author of the The SheEO Blog, on Mentoring. Jen’s enthusiasm was clear from the outset, and some of the lessons and examples she offered as part of her talk were unorthodox, but effective. Of particular note was the information on building a mentoring culture, and how technology can support this process. Jen’s presentation also introduced some information about gender bias, and some interesting data about the differences in gender behaviour when finding a mentor and attributing success. I hadn’t come across Jen’s work before, but was impressed by both her clear passion for the topic, and her self-effacing presentation style.

The second presenter that really highlighted the people aspect was Greg Savage, whose day-closing presentation firmly cemented his reputation as an engaging and informative speaker. Greg spoke on his experiences launching a brand into the social space, and made clear points about interaction, building rapport with your audience and showed how his personal brand, built over thousands of interactions, is a cornerstone of his success. Of particular note was Greg’s attitude on ‘weaving social into the fabric of the company’ rather than adopting it as a mindset.

The World Café sessions are always interesting, and this year’s didn’t disappoint. While I didn’t get to host anything (although I came close when Trevor thought we had a no-show) I did enjoy some fantastic discussions around the tables. And it’s been interesting to read some of the blog posts that have been spawned as a result – I’m sure there’ll be many more to come.

The informal breaks also made for great discussions with both the exhibitors at the event and the other attendees. It’s always great to wander around and hear the discussion topics that spring up after sessions, and read the Twitter wall at the event to see what people are talking about.

All in all, a great event and an excellent barometer of what people are thinking, investigating, inventing and discussing in the Australian talent market. Can’t wait for next year! And a big thank you to Trevor, Kevin, Horace, Karen, the rest of the ATC event team and all the speakers for creating such a dynamic and engaging forum for exploring the always interesting landscape of talent.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,321 other followers